The Effects Of Caffeinated Beverages On The Body - 1046 Words

A cheese burger would not be complete without a tall glass of soda. The fuzzy bubbles accentuate the taste of beef and fries dipped in ketchup. Before the burger is devoured, the cup of pop sits empty. Time for a refill. By the time the meal is over, the Styrofoam cup has been emptied three times. â€Å"I paid for this, so I might as well enjoy it at home.† The words slip through burps as soda floods the container. Many people are caught in the trap of sugary, caffeinated beverages at restaurants, movie theaters, gas stations, and various other places. But the people who absent mindedly sip the drink, and they are unaware of how the caffeinated beverage affects their body. Caffeinated beverages lead to negative effects on the body such†¦show more content†¦Caffeinated beverages also provoke the risk of diabetes. Barry Michael Popkin, a food science researcher, et al, discovered that â€Å"[p]eople who consume sugary drinks regularly—1 to 2 cans a day or more—have a 26% greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes than people who rarely have such drinks† (par 2). Due to the high quantity of sugar in the beverages, the amount of glucose in the bloodstream increases. The body cannot produce enough insulin or cannot use it effectively, causing drastic effects. Due to the high amounts of sugar in caffeinated beverages, lasting and even fatal consequences to a person’s weight and blood stream. Also, the products or lack of them can cause damaging results to the body. Consuming soda or coffee can lead to tooth and bone decay. The human mouth contains bacteria that reacts critically with the acid in caffeinated beverages. William Calnon, the president of the Wisconsin Detail Institution, conducted an experiment stating that â€Å"diet or ‘sugar-free’ soda contains its own acid, which also can damage teeth† (par 7). The mouth produces many bacteria, some fight against diseases while others promote tooth decay. But when the acids in the soda react with the bacteria and acids that naturally exist in the mouth, tooth damage is stimulated. The stimulation promotes cavities and painful aches in the teeth. Studies also have shown that drinking caffeine linked to bone damage.

The Effects Of Sleep Deprivation On Your Immune System

College students and individuals across the country are suffering from a health problem that can be more detrimental to their health than some forms of cancer. What is it? Lack of sleep. Lack of sleep can harm your everyday life. You may not think that it is a big deal to lose a few hours of sleep instead of getting the recommended eight hours. When in fact you could be harming yourself or somebody that is around you. Technology keeps us from getting the sleep that we need to stay healthy. According to Timothy Morgenthaler, M.D. from the Mayo clinic â€Å"a lack of sleep can affect your immune system. Studies show that people who don t get quality sleep or enough sleep are more likely to get sick and much slower to recover. During sleep, your immune system releases proteins called cytokines. Sleep deprivation may decrease production of these infection-fighting proteins. Long-term lack of sleep also increases your risk of obesity, diabetes, and heart and blood vessel (cardiovascular) disease.† There are a lot of things that probably keep us from sleeping at night. The most common three are the cell phone, television and computer. David Cloud, CEO of the National Sleep Foundation reports, While these technologies are commonplace, it is clear that we have a lot more to learn about the appropriate use and design of this technology to complement good sleep habits. First I will start with the cell phone. Majority of teens that have a cell phone probably use their phone as aShow MoreRelatedSleep Deprivation Essay1250 Words   |  5 PagesSleep deprivation is defined as the situation or condition of suffering from lack of sleep. Sleep deprivation is super common now days. People begin at such a young age. Most people can recall the first time they wanted to stay up super late to watch television, or hang out with their friends at a sleep over. Kids are constantly seeing older sibling and parents staying up and choosing other things over sleep. They’re taught at such a young age that sleep deprivation is an okay thing to do. We aren’tRead MoreSleep And Sleep : Sleep Schedule Look Like852 Words   |  4 Pageshave a roommate that comes back to your room at all hours of the night, this can severely affect your life as a whole. Sleep is essential to the human body performing in a variety of tasks. If you are constantly being woken up at various times throughout the night, it can have negative consequences on your impact to learn and your health. So what does a typical night’s sleep schedule look like? A typical night’s sleep is much more complicated than just closing your eyes and waking in the morning. AsRead MoreEffects of Sleep Deprivation881 Words   |  4 PagesSleep is an essential part of life. Without sleep, the body does not get the energy that it needs to function. Yet a large amount of people do not get anywhere near the amount of sleep they need. Whether it is because of medical reasons or because there just is not enough time in the day, sleep deprivation is a major problem in todays society. The many people who do not get enough sleep usually end up suffering the consequences. No good can come from not getting enough sleep. Sleep deprivation hasRead MoreHow Lack of Sleep Affects the Human Body Essay829 Words   |  4 PagesAssignment #1 Sleep is as essential to the body as the food we eat, the air we breathe, and water we drink, it’s a vital necessity for human survival. Due to our spending 1/3 of our life sleeping, more than anything else, clearly indicates the importance of sleep to the human body. A good night’s sleep helps to restore energy you expend during the day, the brain is actively working while you sleep to create new pathways for areas such as learning, memories and new insights, helps your body to fightRead MoreHow Does Lack Sleep Affect 11-18 Year Old Adolescent?1142 Words   |  5 Pageslack of sleep affect 11-18 year old adolescent? Introduction What is sleep? Sleep is â€Å"A condition of body and mind which typically recurs for several hours every night, in which the nervous system is inactive, the eyes closed, the postural muscles relaxed, and consciousness practically suspended†. People spend, on average, approximately a third of our life asleep. Along with eating, drinking and breathing, sleeping is one of the pillars for maintaining good mental and physical health. Sleep is reallyRead MoreSleep Deprivation And Its Effects On Society1431 Words   |  6 PagesBeing a full time student and avid participant in the community, sleep usually falls by the wayside as the struggle to maintain a healthy balance of activities and work continues. Sleep deprivation can actually be very devastating, having a huge affects on work ethic and focus. Sleep deprivation is â€Å"the condition of being robbed of sleep,† according to Dictionary.com. â€Å"A chronic sleep-restricted state can cause fatigue, daytime sleepiness , clumsiness, weight loss or weight gain,† giving it a substantialRead MoreSpeech On Sleep Deprivation And College Students1305 Words   |  6 PagesDilan Behrle Topic: Sleep Deprivation Organization: Topically Specific Purpose: Sleep and college students usually don’t tend to get along very well. Sleep and college life often bump heads due to stress, coursework and social activities. This speech will give the students useful information about dangers of not getting enough sleep and also hints on how to get a better nights sleep. INTRODUCTION A. Attention Getter: Did you know 40% of Americans or (100 million people) are moderatelyRead MoreBeing Sleep Deprived Is A Person That Is Constantly Tired1325 Words   |  6 PagesThe most obvious signs of someone being sleep deprived is a person that is constantly tired. However, being more drowsy and more prone to falling asleep during the day can put the person at a greater risk to have fatigue related accidents. Therefore, it would be a better and a more safe way to pay attention to the more subtle symptoms of fatigue rather than waiting for someone to start to nod back and forth between consciousness and the dream world. So instead it would prove effective to performRead MoreSleep On It ! By Robert Stickgold749 Words   |  3 PagesSummary of SLEEP ON IT! SLEEP ON IT! is written by Robert Stickgold, director of the Center for Sleep, who explains the research done on the importance of sleep. The article begins by asking whether we really need to sleep? Stickgold explains how everyone needs to sleep because it is driven physiologically to be done. Allan Rechtschaffen, the world`s greatest sleep researchers of the 70’s, says that sleep is the most vital function of life. Where as J. Allan Hobson, also a great sleep researcherRead MoreSleep Deprivation Persuasive Speech1577 Words   |  7 PagesChronic Sleep Deprivation Introduction: A. Attention Getting Opening: Over the past ten to twenty years, academic demands placed upon college students have increased significantly, this has lead to an increase in workload and amount of time needed to study for a specific course. Today, college students represent the most sleep-deprived division of the population in the U.S. (Sleep and Memory). According to Gayla Martindale, 63% percent of the students who attend college do not get enough sleep, which

Personal Ethical View Point Free Essays

Even though I do not always speak up when I know something is wrong, I have a strong code of personal ethics because I believe loyalty, honesty, and above all, respect for others will guide me to make me the proper ethical decisions throughout my life. I feel that I am a very loyal person. I believe that I am easy to get along with and can make friends without effort. We will write a custom essay sample on Personal Ethical View Point or any similar topic only for you Order Now Once I make friends, I have them for life. I have always prided myself on supporting decisions that my friends and family make, even if I know they are a mistake. Who am I to correct anyone’s actions? I understand the importance of making mistakes, so we can learn from them. Along with loyalty, I pride myself on having great fortitude. I am not easily swayed in my beliefs. I will listen to other view points and understand the importance of different beliefs, but I stand strong with the facts that I have discovered in which I developed my beliefs. Although I say that I respect other people’s opinion, I will fight for a cause I believe in, and I will back it up with every bit of energy I have if I feel something needs to be done to correct an action. I have noticed that I will tell people the truth, even if it may hurt them, but I will only do so when asked for an opinion. I know that telling a lie will only hurt me in the long run, so I am thankful that I am an extremely honest person. Lies will always come back to haunt me, and I am aware of that fact. I prefer to go through life without the stress of being caught in a lie. Honesty always pays off in the long run, even if it may cause feelings to be hurt. Working hard is a trait I value in my life. Not just physical labor, but mental work as well. I am tenacious in working through a problem until it is solved. I generally work hard on everything I set out to accomplish. I also believe that it takes a great sense of critical thinking to achieve successful hard work. I recognize that working hard comes with a set of rewards unattainable any other way. Along with all the great qualities I have, I would not be human if I said I did not have some negative qualities as well. To me, having some negative qualities does not necessarily mean it is a shame, but instead, I believe having negative points only helps balance out the positive. For instance, I have been known to be overly quiet when I should have spoken up on someone’s behalf. In other words, I do not always stick up for others when they are being treated poorly. I do get an overwhelming feeling that I should be strong and say something, but the quiet person inside me feels more comfortable and I weigh the options of making a situation worse, rather than better. When I notice something is wrong, I have a tendency to ignore the situation unless it involves me. I believe this goes back to deciding if my opinion will make a situation worse. I know this is a quality that I must work on in order to continue to become a better person. If more people spoke up, maybe this world could become better? This is what I consider to be my biggest character flaw. Additionally, I also have been known to give into peer pressure. Not when it comes to drugs or other unhealthy activities, but I will often follow others actions when participating in activities that make me feel uncomfortable. Also, I often take advice from people, even if I know it is not the best advice. Perhaps this is a way of showing respect to others. As I have stated, I pride myself on being a strong person, but sometimes this conflicts with the desire to make others feel valued around me. When I speak of value, there is only one thing that I value the most, and that is my family that I have created. The best gift I was given was my children and my loving husband in which I would do anything for. They are the reason I try to be successful. I have worked very hard at teaching them a great sense of personal ethics of their own, and I support my family’s decisions whether I feel them to be right or wrong. If a member of my family does make a decision that could have had a better outcome, I let them figure out the issue, and I always suggest new ideas in order to still give a structured solution, while that individual still learns from their mistakes. Again, even though I do not always speak up when I know something is wrong, I have a strong code of personal ethics because I believe loyalty, honesty, and above all, respect for others will guide me to make me the proper ethical decisions throughout my life. How might you use your personal ethics to determine a course of action? I have an example in which my personal ethics were greatly tested. When I was still working as an Assistant Security Director, the head Security Director was a very harsh, uncaring, pushy type of a person. He often treated all of his employees very poorly. He called everyone awful names. Once an employee had made a mistake within their job duties, my boss would forever hold that over their heads and often referred to those employees as â€Å"his retards. † He would even introduce them to other people that were hired into our department as retard # 1, 2, 3. On a daily basis, I would watch our most manly men come into the security office with their head held high, only to watch them leave feeling less of a man, and their heads hung low. My boss would also make sexual remarks to all the female security officers and I know it made them feel very uncomfortable. The Security Director knew that what he was doing was terribly wrong, because he threatened everyone’s jobs if they went to his boss. Most of the employees felt helpless. I believe this is where the quiet part of me stood in the way, because I did not say anything to him or anyone else even though I was just under his rank. I would often go home and reflect what the Security Director had done for the day and watched how people’s feelings were affected, including mine. After much embarrassment, hurt feelings and lack of pride, I finally let my personal ethics shine through. After a lot of intense reflection, as well as begging from the rest of the staff, I decided it was time to do what I could to stop my boss’s behavior. I stood up for all my employees knowing I could lose my job. I was tired of knowing in my heart that what he was doing was wrong on so many levels. I went above his head and secured a meeting with his boss. I spoke up and evealed all of my boss’s behaviors. I was completely uncomfortable doing so, but I knew it was the right decision that I had made. In the end, the Security Director was given a choice to leave or be publicly dismissed of his duties. I believe the result of me adhering to my strong code of personal ethics was the catalyst for this situation. All the employees who were harassed and bullied by my boss were so thankful and appreciative. My company had hired an investigator and every single employee was interviewed on the topic. Almost everyone stood behind me and showed their support. I guess they just needed someone stand up and be heard. How to cite Personal Ethical View Point, Essay examples

Breach of Duties by the Directors

Question: Write about theBreach of Duties by the Directors. Answer: Introduction: The presentation is about the study of the recent case law in which the Federal Court of Australia held director of company liable under Corporation Act 2001 for breach of the duties. In Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) vs. Cassimatis (2016) FCA 1023, the Australian Combined court had determined that the description of care duties which is to be owed by the directors under section 180(1) of the Corporation Act. The court held that the director of the economy services had violate his duties as director, as it was the responsibility of the director to be cognizant that his company was probably to breach the provisions of the Corporations Act, with the ruinous effect for the company (Aganin, 2016). Facts of the Case: Storm Financial Limited (in short Storm) was the Australian economy services licence holder and the company had given the economical services as per the model development by Mr. Cassimatis. He is one of the two directors of the company i.e. Storm. The model of Mr. Cassimatis involved the clients borrowed against the fairness for their homes, also obtained the edge loans and the company used those funds for investing in the index funding and creating a cash reserve. The project was enforced to all of the clients of the company as the only condition is that they have the capability to borrow the funds. As the company i.e. Storm used the double gearing model due to which the investors continued grave losses during the period of the Global Economical Crisis (Anderson and Feist, 2017). Australian Investment and Securities commission had commenced the proceedings in the year 2010 against both the directors i.e. Mr and Mrs Cassimatis alleging that the duties of care and diligence had been breached as being the director of the company it was their duty under section 180(1) of the corporation act (Bostock, 2012). Australian Investment and Securities commission had alleged that both the directors had made breach of their duties when the company i.e. Storm was financially fit and they both were the directors of the company and shareholders, moreover there was no conflict that the directors had to manage the company i.e. Storm in conformity with the wishes of the shareowners (Burrows, 2010). Australian Investment and Securities commission had made allegations that the financial services provided as per the model to the class of the vulnerable investors who were very near to their retreat, has very limited assets income and there was zero anticipation of retrieving the economical position in the condition of loss. By doing this the company had made the breach of the provisions of the corporations act that there was the reasonable basis for the economical advice to the clients. Australian Investment and Securities commission had made allegations that the directors of the company had breach the duties under section 180(1) of the corporation act as following: Both the directors of the company had cause or permit the company i.e. Storm to administer advice to their investors as per the model which results that the Storm had made contravene to the provisions of the Corporations act (Anderson and Feist, 2017). Both the directors of the company had cause or permit the company i.e. Storm to administer the financial advice in the manner as it violate the provisions of the Corporations act, 2001(Cline, 2000). The allegations of the Australian Investment and Securities commission was that the exposure of the company i.e. Storm to the risk was more than it would have if any director acting with due care and diligence (Grantham, 1991). Section 180(1) of the Corporations Act: Section 180 of the Corporation act, 2001 had brought the civil obligation which says that the director or the other officer of the company should at all the time perform the reasonable degree of care and diligence in performing their powers and in discharge of their duties. Reasonable in the simple sense means that the degrees of proper care and diligence which the reasonable person in such a situation in the corporation would perform in the same situation (Lim, 2013). The need for the director or the officer of the company to perform the reasonable test of care and diligence would be satisfied in regard to the particular business judgments where the director or the officer could make the judgement in the good faith and for a reasonable determination (Moore, 2016). The director or the officer of the company did not have the personal interest while making the judgment for the company. The director of company should rationally trust that the judgement made by him is in the good interes t of the company. In short, from the perusal of the readings of the Section 180 of the corporation act it is clear that the director or any of the officers of the company should take the active interest in the affairs of the company and also get the general understanding of the business of the company. In the present case, the Federal Court of Australia had analysis under section 180(1) of the corporation act that whether the director of the company i.e. Storm had performed the reasonable test of care and diligence while performing their powers in exonerate of their duties. The court found that the analysis involves the determination of all the circumstances which includes the ascertainable hazard of the damage in the interest of the company, the consequences of that damage, the major welfare which accumulates from the conduct of the director and to the essence to the company of any of the action to allay the ascertainable harm (Nwafor and Nwafor, 2014). In the present case the court held that the company i.e. Storm had made the breach of provisions of the corporation act which provides the financial services as per the model to the class of the vulnerable clients which are verified by the Australian Investment and Securities commission and the directors of the company had made breach of the duty of the due care and diligence because of the reason that the reasonable director of the company in such circumstances as like in the Storm and the responsibilities of the Mr and Mrs cassimatis will have to became aware of the strong prospect of the breach of the company act and if the directors had performed their actions to cause or to allowing the model of the Storm which was to enforced to the clients who were in the category to be pleaded by the Australian Investment and Securities commission, as the particular investors who would retired or very close to the retirement with the very less asset and few income (OFAC compliance in the secu rities and investment sector, 2012). The court held that the breach of the provisions of the corporations act by the company i.e. Storm were not merely accountable but the reasonable director is in the emplacement of the Cassimatis who would have found them as like (Sirignano and Farrell, 2005). The court held that the conduct of the directors of the company was the single breach by each of both of the directors and there were no multiple breaches relates with the no. of the investors who established the category of the vulnerable investors. Australian Investment and Securities commission had accepted that there was only one breach by each of the directors. The court had also held that if it is determined that Mr and Mrs Cassimatis had performed their act honestly and fairly with regard to the capital loss would never take place with the index find investiture in the model prepared by the Storm. The court found that the conduct of the directors cannot be relieved under Section 1317 of the corporations act as they have very important role and responsibilities and also the seriousness of the breaches of the provisions of the act made by the Storm (Worthington, 2001). Issues in the Case: The Judgement of the Federal Court of Australia involves the discussion on the many issues like as: Whether the breach by the Strom was mandatory for the directors to contravene section 180(1)? Australian Investment and Securities commission proceeded its case on the basis that the company i.e. Storm had actually contravene the provisions of the company act as the stepping stone of the contraventions by the directors under section 180(1). The court had suggested that the court had serious doubts on the conduct of the directors. Whether the actual breach was needed for the contravention by the directors under section 180(1) but it ran on the ground that the actual breach was required (Lim, 2013). The court had rejected the submission made by the Australian Investment and Securities commission that the actual contravention by the company was sufficient to create a contravene of section 180(1) by the directors of the company. Whether the duties prescribed under section 180(1) of the corporation act are owed by the company alone? Upon this issue the directors of the company had submitted that the duties prescribed under section 180(1) of the corporation act were owed by the company alone while Australian Investment and Securities commission had submitted that Section 180(1) of the corporation act gives a rules of conduct which is different from the interest of the company and the reason behind that the publics duty at large is owed by the directors (Grantham, 1991). The court had admitted the submissions made by the shareowners but also noted down that the interest of the company must not be seen narrowly and must not limited to the interest which was only for the shareholders. The interest of the company was not limited to the economical loss but also includes the damage made to reputation. Whether the directors could be liable for the breach of section 180(1) of the corporation act where the directors are the only share holders of the solvent company? The directors had made the submissions that the director is the sole share holder of the solvent company and it would not amount to violation of section 180(1) of the corporation act. The compliance was made on the ground that it is the duty of the director as well as the shareholders to assume the avocation of the profit. The directors had made submission that they had acted with due care and diligence even if they had contravened the provisions of the corporation act because they were the directors as well as the shareholders of the company (Anderson and Feist, 2017). The court had rejected the submissions and held that the submissions were not supported by the wordings of the section 180(1) of the corporation act. The shareholders might be able authorize the acts which are the contraventions under the corporation act but could not ratify them. Conclusion: In the end it is to be concluded that the stakeholders of the company had to perform their duties with due care and application. From the study of the present case law it has also been considered that the stakeholders of the financial fit company where they are the only share holders might violate their duties of the care and application and if the conduct as the director makes the company to violate the law, then the directors are liable. Furthermore it has also been considered that Australian Investment and Securities commission has shown their willingness to continue the proceedings in this situation, particularly when the violation of the provision of the corporation act had made an impact on the clients of the company. Where the directors adopts the course of the conduct as the model investiture strategy for the group or the class of the client investor, any violation of the corporation act which arise from the conduct and limited to the single breach of the duty. References Aganin, A. (2016). Review of securities class action filings in 2015.Journal of Investment Compliance, 17(3), pp.1-27. Anderson, B. and Feist, G. (2017). Transformative science: a new index and the impact of non-funding, private funding, and public funding.Social Epistemology, 31(2), pp.130-151. Bostock, T. (2012). The Corporations Act 2001.Amicus Curiae, 2002(39). Burrows, S. (2010). Directors' Duties (1st edition)20102Andrew Keay. Directors' Duties (1st edition). Jordan Publishing Limited, 2009. 476pp.International Journal of Law and Management, 52(6), pp.482-483. Cline, W. (2000). Challenges Facing Global Financial Markets.Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 2000(1), pp.467-475. Grantham, R. (1991). Directors' Duties and Insolvent Companies.The Modern Law Review, 54(4), pp.576-581. Lim, E. (2013). Directors' duties: improper purposes or implied terms?.Legal Studies, 34(3), pp.395-418. Moore, C. (2016). Obligations in the shade: the application of fiduciary directors' duties to shadow directors.Legal Studies, 36(2), pp.326-353. Nwafor, A. and Nwafor, G. (2014). Breach of duty: power of shareholders to ratify directors fraudulent dealings.Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 10(2). Nwafor, A. and Nwafor, G. (2014). Breach of duty: power of shareholders to ratify directors fraudulent dealings.Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 10(2). OFAC compliance in the securities and investment sector. (2012).Journal of Investment Compliance, 13(3), pp.21-26. Sirignano, D. and Farrell, S. (2005). Securities offering reform proposal.Journal of Investment Compliance, 6(2), pp.44-47. Worthington, S. (2001). Reforming Directors Duties.Modern Law Review, 64(3), pp.413-438. Burrows, S. (2010). Directors' Duties (1st edition)20102Andrew Keay. Directors' Duties (1st edition). Jordan Publishing Limited, 2009. 476pp.International Journal of Law and Management, 52(6), pp.482-483. Cline, W. (2000). Challenges Facing Global Financial Markets.Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 2000(1), pp.467-475. Grantham, R. (1991). Directors' Duties and Insolvent Companies.The Modern Law Review, 54(4), pp.576-581.